🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I usually steered clear of extensive use of chance during my Dungeons & Dragons adventures. I preferred was for story direction and session development to be guided by character actions instead of pure luck. However, I chose to change my approach, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Seeing 'Luck Rolls'

An influential podcast features a DM who often calls for "fate rolls" from the participants. This involves picking a type of die and defining consequences based on the number. While it's at its core no distinct from using a random table, these are created on the spot when a player's action lacks a predetermined resolution.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own session, primarily because it appeared novel and presented a departure from my standard routine. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to reflect on the often-debated balance between planning and improvisation in a tabletop session.

A Memorable Story Beat

During one session, my group had concluded a city-wide battle. Afterwards, a cleric character inquired after two key NPCs—a brother and sister—had lived. In place of deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both would perish; a middling roll, a single one would die; on a 10+, they made it.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a incredibly moving scene where the characters came upon the remains of their companions, still clasped together in death. The cleric conducted a ceremony, which was particularly powerful due to prior character interactions. As a final gesture, I improvised that the NPCs' bodies were strangely restored, containing a magical Prayer Bead. I rolled for, the bead's magical effect was precisely what the group lacked to address another critical story problem. It's impossible to orchestrate these kinds of serendipitous coincidences.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This incident made me wonder if chance and spontaneity are in fact the essence of D&D. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Groups frequently excel at ignoring the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to think quickly and create content in the moment.

Using similar mechanics is a fantastic way to develop these abilities without going completely outside your preparation. The trick is to use them for small-scale circumstances that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. To illustrate, I would not employ it to determine if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. However, I might use it to figure out if the party reach a location right after a major incident unfolds.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

This technique also helps make players feel invested and cultivate the sensation that the story is dynamic, progressing based on their actions immediately. It prevents the perception that they are merely actors in a pre-written script, thereby enhancing the collaborative foundation of roleplaying.

This approach has always been integral to the core of D&D. Original D&D were reliant on charts, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. Although current D&D often focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, that may not be the best approach.

Achieving the Right Balance

It is perfectly no problem with being prepared. However, it's also fine no problem with stepping back and allowing the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Direction is a big part of a DM's responsibilities. We use it to manage the world, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, at times when doing so might improve the game.

The core recommendation is this: Do not fear of temporarily losing control. Experiment with a little randomness for smaller details. It may discover that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more powerful than anything you could have pre-written on your own.